Three shapes · pick one or invent another

Three ways into this. Or none. Or something different.

Whatever the right next step is, scope leads pricing. Three engagement shapes below. We can take any of them, or none, or invent something else that fits Oleo specifically. No pressure on the call to commit.

Option A · Small + fast

Operations Audit + Roadmap

A 4 week deeper-than-this-orb engagement. End-to-end ops audit. Module-by-module backlog with cost estimates and sequencing.

System and process inventory
Module prioritisation by ROI and dependency
Detailed scope + business case for the modules
Output is the proposal you take to the next call
Fixed fee. No retainer commitment.

Option B · Pilot one moduleRecommended

Pilot one module

Pick the highest-leverage module - we recommend admin AI (Module 7) plus a starter slice of prescriber onboarding (Module 1) - and build it together, fixed-fee, 6 to 8 weeks.

Working software in your operation
Clear before-and-after measurement
Establishes the working pattern
Easy to extend module by module after
Zero open-ended commitment

Option C · Full

Phased retainer

Track 1 ops execution + Track 2 GEO + content + Track 3 paid (conditional). Phased over 6 to 12 months with quarterly reviews.

Multiple modules in flight at once
Marketing + ops + paid in lockstep
Quarterly KPI review against the targets in the 90-day plan
Most leverage. Largest commitment.
Quarterly opt-out built in.

What happens after the call

If any of this is interesting, John follows up tomorrow with a deeper one-pager on whichever option lands best in the conversation. No commitment on this call. No pricing in this room. Just the question: which shape feels right?

If none of these fits the actual problem, we re-shape. We are not married to these three.